Some time ago, I received a letter from a woman who was seeking an answer to a question that an
unbeliever had presented to her. The question that gave her so much trouble, and that seemed to
plant a seed of doubt in her mind about the inerrancy of Scripture, was this: Did Jesse (the
father of David) have seven sons or eight? This question arises from a comparison of the
information about Jesses family in 1 Samuel 16-17 with the genealogy given in 1 Chronicles
chapter two.
First Samuel 16 states that Jesse made seven sons pass before the prophet Samuel, in hopes that
God would anoint one of them as the next king of Israel (16:10). Samuel then informed Jesse that
God had not chosen any of these seven sons that passed before him, but was looking for another. Of
course, that other son was David, the youngest (16:11) of Jesses eight
sons (17:12). The problem with this information is that the genealogy in 1
Chronicles 2:13-15 specifically states that David was the seventh son of Jesse. How is
it that David could be both the seventh son and eighth son of Jesse? Some are eager to call this a
legitimate Bible contradiction. Even many Bible students (like the one who wrote me about this
question) read these statements for the first time and wonder if this is an inconsistency in
the Word. What is the answer? How many sons did Jesse have? And was David Jesses
eighth son or seventh?
The answer is really quite simple. It seems that one of Jesses sons shown to Samuel at
Bethlehem must have died while young and without posterity. Thus, at one time David was the
youngest of eight sons, and at another time he was the youngest of seven sons. We
must keep in mind that Hebrew genealogies often included only the names of those who have some
significance for future generations (Richards, 1993, p. 106; Nelsons Illustrated Bible
Dictionary, 1986). It makes sense that if one of Davids brothers died before marrying
and begetting children (or before doing something extraordinary), he would not have been
mentioned.
Lest you think this situation sounds too bizarre, consider the following. Fifty years ago,
whenever my father engaged in a discussion about his family, he would tell people that he had
five brothers and two sisters. Today, when he converses with others about his family he often
speaks of his four brothers and two sisters. Is he being dishonest when he does so? No.
Sadly, when my dad was 19 years old, one of his younger brothers died in a tragic accident.
Although this brother was loved deeply and is missed greatly, usually when my father is asked
about his siblings he simply says: I have four brothers and two sisters. If he
has time or feels there is a need, he then will mention his other brother who died at a very young
age. The point is, whether my dad tells someone that he is the oldest of eight children or the
oldest of seven children, he is telling the truth.
Admittedly, the Bible does not say specifically that one of Davids brothers died at a
young age. But, it most likely is implying such a thing when one less son is mentioned in 1
Chronicles 2:13-15. [And considering Davids three oldest brothers were warriors in
Sauls army (1 Samuel 17:13ff), one certainly would not be surprised if one of Davids
other brothers also became a soldier and died in battle.]
To say that one of Davids brothers dying at a relatively young age is not an option is to
assert that the Bible does not teach by implication. [Yet, as anyone who has studied the Bible
knows, it most certainly does teach by implication (cf. Acts 8:35-36).] Furthermore, if people
today who have lost children or siblings can speak legitimately about their family number in two
different ways, should we not also give Bible writers the same freedom in their recording of
historical families?
REFERENCES
Genealogy, (1986), Nelsons Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Thomas
Nelson Publishers).
Richards, Larry (1993), 735 Baffling Bible Questions Answered (Grand Rapids, MI:
Revell).
Copyright © 2002 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
U.S.A.
Phone (334) 272-8558
http://www.apologeticspress.org